In every election season, politicians court the youth with promises, slogans, and hashtags. Yet one uncomfortable question continues to echo across campuses, communities, and online spaces. “Are Ghanaian youth truly aware of the power they hold or are they surrendering it through apathy and disengagement?”
If mobilised, informed, and determined, Ghanaian youth could become the single most decisive voting bloc in the country’s democratic journey.
By: Stephen Armah Quaye, Toronto-Canada.
More than half of Ghana’s population falls between the ages of 18 and 36. This demographic reality alone should make the youth the most influential force in elections, presidential, parliamentary, and internal party contests alike. Yet influence is not automatic. It must be exercised. And that exercise begins at the ballot box.
As the New Patriotic Party (NPP) prepares for its presidential primary on January 31, 2026, followed by the general elections on December 7, 2028, it is increasingly evident that the youth vote may determine not only party leadership but the future direction of Ghana’s governance. The question, however, is whether young Ghanaians will rise to that responsibility or remain disengaged observers of decisions that directly shape their lives.
Across the country, young people are grappling with harsh realities. The cancellation and restoration of tertiary student allowances, rising graduate unemployment, delayed salary payments, underemployment, and a cost of living that continues to outpace earnings. These are not abstract policy debates, they are lived experiences. Yet frustration alone does not translate into change unless it is channeled through democratic participation.
A critical examination of recent elections suggests a troubling pattern. Low youth turnout. Complaints from young people today about joblessness, student hardship, and limited opportunities raise an uncomfortable counter-question, “did these same voices turn up at the polls to demand better through their votes?” When young voters stay away from elections, governments feel less compelled to prioritise their concerns.
History offers clear lessons. Former Deputy Minister of Education in charge of Tertiary Education, now Foreign Affairs Minister, Mr. Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, once argued that the cancellation of tertiary student allowances under the first John Mahama administration increased enrollment in higher institutions. The counter-argument, forcefully made by former Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia, was that the cancellation imposed severe hardship on students from less privileged backgrounds an injustice the NPP later sought to correct by restoring allowances.
Similarly, education policy debates have revealed stark contrasts. President John Dramani Mahama, while campaigning, once suggested that Ghana was not ready for free compulsory universal secondary education. Yet once in office, the narrative shifted, with claims of foundational work toward Free SHS. In contrast, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo campaigned explicitly on Free SHS and implemented it within his first year as president, fundamentally altering access to education for Ghanaian youth.
On employment, promises have flowed freely. The Akufo-Addo administration introduced initiatives such as Planting for Food and Jobs, drawing many unemployed young people into agribusiness. On the other hand, President Mahama has urged youth to acquire skills to take advantage of opportunities within what he describes as a resilient economy. These competing narratives underscore one reality, political outcomes matter, and youth votes help determine which vision prevails.
The upcoming NPP presidential primary presents a critical moment. With five aspirants offering competing visions, policies, and leadership styles, the youth particularly young delegates and first-time voters hold disproportionate influence. Their collective choice could shape not just the party’s candidate but the tone of national politics heading into 2028.
It is therefore not surprising that youth engagement has become a focal point of the campaign. Among the aspirants, Kennedy Ohene Agyapong has made deliberate efforts to connect with young voters through campus engagements, social media outreach, and direct messaging. His promises of job creation, increased student loans, and expanded grants are clearly designed to resonate with a generation burdened by unemployment and educational costs. Whether one agrees with his proposals or not, the strategy reflects an acknowledgment of youth power.
However, this is where caution is essential. No political party should assume that youth support is automatic or permanent. Young voters are increasingly discerning, impatient with empty promises, and quick to withdraw support when expectations are unmet. Engagement must therefore be continuous, sincere, and results-driven.
For the youth themselves, the message is even clearer, disengagement is costly. Every election missed is a decision made by others often older generations whose priorities may not align with the struggles of students, graduates, and young workers. Political participation is not merely a civic duty, it is a tool for self-preservation and advancement.
If Ghanaian youth organise, vote in large numbers, and hold leaders accountable after elections, they can compel any government NPP, NDC, or otherwise to prioritise jobs, education, skills training, and economic opportunity. If they do not, they risk remaining a rhetorical talking point rather than a governing priority.
The Ghanaian youth are not powerless. They are numerically dominant, socially influential, and increasingly informed. What remains is the will to act. January 31, 2026, and December 7, 2028, are not just dates on the electoral calendar, they are opportunities for a generation to assert its relevance.
The sleeping giant can either rise or continue to be spoken for.
0 Comments