The formal presentation of the Bawku
Peace Mediation Report by His Royal Majesty Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, King of
Asante, to President John Dramani Mahama, President of the Republic of Ghana, marks
a significant milestone in one of Ghana’s most protracted conflicts.
The months of engagement have given
way to an even more delicate stage of reconciliation. The media’s role at this
stage becomes not just critical but decisive; how the media tells the story
after mediation and during reconciliation matters.
My research on the role of the media
in conflict resolution, using the Dagbon chieftaincy conflict as a case study in
2019, offers important lessons for how Ghana’s media should operate after
mediation processes conclude. The study, which analyzed coverage by Daily
Graphic and Daily Guide alongside in-depth interviews with senior
journalists and editors, found that while the media was not directly involved
in formal mediation structures, it nonetheless functioned as an active,
indirect actor in the peace process. This insight is particularly relevant to
Bawku today.
Why the reconciliation
phase is high-risk
Peace agreements and mediation reports
do not necessarily translate into peace on the ground. In fact, the
post-mediation phase is often the most fragile, where expectations are high,
emotions remain raw, and interpretations of outcomes can easily become
polarized.
In Dagbon, media reports played a
crucial role in shaping public understanding of the peace process. A good
number of reports during the mediation and immediate post-mediation period
consciously emphasized calm, the legitimacy of traditional processes, and the
need for coexistence. This peace-oriented framing helped generate public
support for reconciliation and reduced the likelihood of renewed violence.
However, the research also showed that
where reporting lacked context, relied on speculative commentary, or framed
developments as wins and losses, tensions resurfaced quickly.
The Need for Conflict-Sensitive
Reporting Guidelines
One of the key recommendations from my
Dagbon study is the need for newsrooms to document their ethics and norms for
conflict reporting in formal editorial policy guides. During the Dagbon
process, a good number of journalists applied conflict-sensitive principles
instinctively rather than institutionally. While commendable, this approach is
inconsistent and risky.
Documented editorial policies on conflict reporting serve several vital
functions. First, they provide clear guidance to journalists, especially
younger reporters, on language use, sourcing, framing, and verification in
conflict contexts. Second, they ensure consistency, preventing contradictory
narratives within the same media house. Third, they protect media organizations
by anchoring editorial decisions in agreed-upon ethical standards rather than
individual bias.
In conflict situations, ambiguity can be dangerous. A single headline,
poorly contextualized quote, or sensational framing can undo months of
mediation. Conflict – reporting policy documents serve as guardrails, helping
journalists navigate these risks responsibly.
As Ghana continues to grapple with communal and chieftaincy conflicts,
newsrooms must invest in codified conflict-reporting handbooks or editorial
policy guidelines, as this is no longer optional but a peacebuilding
necessity.
The Bawku Peace Mediation Report
offers Ghana a chance not only to resolve a conflict but to deepen a culture of
peace. Whether that opportunity is realized will depend, in part, on how the
media performs its role in the reconciliation phase.
The Dagbon experience has shown that
responsible journalism can support healing. The challenge now is for Ghana’s
media to apply those lessons deliberately, ethically, and consistently, because
peace is not sustained by agreements alone, but by the stories we choose to
tell.
Short Bio of Author
Princess
Sekyere Bih
is a communications and development professional and a graduate researcher
whose work focuses on media, conflict, and peacebuilding in Ghana. She has
researched the role of Ghana’s media in the Dagbon conflict resolution process.

0 Comments